Follow us on

Thursday, May 23, 2013 | 4:14 a.m.

Posted: 12:04 p.m. Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Five ex-officials convicted in Bell city corruption case

Bell City Corruption
Francine Orr
FILE - This Jan. 24, 2013 file photo, former Bell, Calif., city officials appear for a massive city corruption trial in a downtown Los Angeles courtroom. Verdicts have been reached in the trial of six former elected officials of the tiny Los Angeles County city of Bell. A Superior Court spokeswoman says the verdicts will be read Wednesday, March 20, 2013. The former mayor and five other ex-officials are accused of misappropriation of public funds by giving themselves enormous salaries. (AP Photo/Los Angeles Times, Francine Orr, Pool,File)

KTVU and AP Wires

LOS ANGELES —

Five former elected officials of the tiny California city of Bell were convicted Wednesday of multiple counts of misappropriation of public funds, and a sixth defendant was cleared entirely.

Former Mayor Oscar Hernandez and co-defendants Teresa Jacobo, George Mirabal, George Cole and Victor Belo were all convicted of multiple counts and acquitted of others.

The charges against them involved paying themselves inflated salaries of up to $100,000 a year in the city of 36,000 people, where one in four residents live below the poverty line.

An audit by the state controller's office previously found the city had illegally raised property taxes, business license fees and other sources of revenue to pay the salaries. The office ordered the money repaid.

The guilty findings were related to appointment of the defendants to the Solid Waste and Recycling Authority. The board was one of several that prosecutors said council members appointed each other to in order to pad their salaries.

The waste authority was never created legally and met only once in 2006, which boosted pay by about $13,000 per member.

Former Councilman Luis Artiga was found not guilty of a dozen allegations. All the defendants except Artiga had served as mayor at some point.

All were cleared of charges that they illegally tapped public money while serving on the city's Public Financing Authority.

Prosecutors brought an extensive case involving about 100 counts.

After the verdicts were read, Judge Kathleen Kennedy noted there were 10 deadlocked counts and asked the foreman if the panel had exhausted efforts to reach decisions. He said that was correct.

Kennedy nonetheless ordered more deliberations.

The current jury deliberated since Feb. 28, when one member of an original panel was replaced and the judge told the reconstituted group to start talks anew.

The trial was the first court proceeding following disclosures of massive corruption in the gritty town.

A lawyer for Hernandez said during the trial that his client was unschooled, illiterate and not the type of "scholar" who understood the city's finances.

"We elect people who have a good heart. Someone who can listen to your problems and look you in the eye," attorney Stanley Friedman said.

The scandal that rocked Bell raised the curtain on a fiefdom established by powerful former city manager Robert Rizzo. City records revealed that Rizzo had an annual salary and compensation package worth $1.5 million, making him one of the highest paid administrators in the country.

His salary alone was about $800,000 a year, double that of the president of the United States.

To fund his and other officials' salaries, prosecutors say, Rizzo masterminded a scheme to loot the treasury of $5.5 million. He and his assistant city manager, Angela Spaccia, face their own trial later in the year.

Witnesses at the former council members' trial depicted Rizzo as a micro manager who convinced the city's elected officials that they too deserved huge salaries.

He was said to have manipulated council members into signing major financial documents, particularly Hernandez who could not read what he was signing.

After the scandal was disclosed, thousands of Bell residents protested at City Council meetings and staged a successful recall election to throw out the entire council and elect new leaders.

Jurors heard more than three weeks of testimony and saw numerous documents. But when it came time to deliberate, things did not go well.

A juror who claimed she was being harassed by others on the panel acknowledged she had done research on the Internet about her jury service and discussed it with her daughter. The judge found she had committed misconduct and, after five days of deliberations, the weeping juror was dismissed from the panel.

More News

 
Featured Articles
Ads By Google
 

KTVU on Twitter

Bay Area Living

Dolphins, acrobats, aerialists at six flags Cirque show

Dolphins and acrobats putting on a show, who could ask for more? Six Flags Discovery Kingdom in Vallejo just previewed their newest event titled ‘Cirque Dreams - Splashtastic’.