This browser does not support the Video element.
SAN JOSE (BCN)— A number of changes approved today by the San Jose City Council will allow medical marijuana collectives a bit more freedom in conducting business.
In a 10 to 1 vote, the council allowed the city's 16 registered collectives to run two cultivation sites and make deliveries to patients or caregivers. At one point, the city had more than 100 dispensaries, many of them operating illegally.
Under the city's current program, the collectives can cultivate marijuana at an off-site location in San Jose or a neighboring county and must be closed off to the public, assistant to the city manager Michelle
McGurk said during today's council meeting.
Collectives can also cultivate at a second location in any county across the state where it is permitted under the changes approved by the council, according to McGurk.
San Jose is the only city in the county that allows medical marijuana, McGurk said.
No more than two collectives can share a site and the crops. A 50-foot buffer zone is eliminated between cultivation locations, she said.
Another major change is allowing deliveries restricted to only patients and caregivers who are 21 years and older between 8 a.m. and midnight, according to McGurk.
The deliverers must be working for a collective, undergo a background check and submit to vehicle inspections by San Jose police, McGurk said.
"I think the proposed changes are reasonable modifications to a pretty robust program," said Matt Lucero of Buddy's Cannibas.
Lucero said he's happy he can buy from a third party given his shop doesn't have a commercial kitchen to make edibles and other concentrates. However, he does have issues with the biggest change allowing deliveries to a patient's home.
"First of all I think it would cause a security risk," said Lucero. "You are going to be having drivers going out with thousands of dollars worth of valuable products in their car. You are going to have virtual strangers going into the home of our patients."
Many rules under the current program passed by the council in June 2014 will remain in place for the collectives including staying 1,000 feet away from schools and 500 feet away from rehabilitation centers and emergency shelters, she said.
The city will also maintain its zoning districts to downtown commercial spaces except the ground floor, combined industrial and commercial spots, industrial park areas, light industrial sites and heavy industrial locations.
The current program only allows cultivation indoors and collectives have shown little interest in operating greenhouses at industrial areas, McGurk said.
City staff plans to present the council during its Nov. 1 meeting with an urgency ordinance that reinforces the city's ban on recreational marijuana use in response to possible passage of Proposition 64 on the
November ballot that would legalize recreational or adult use of cannabis, McGurk said.
San Jose police Chief Eddie Garcia contrasted the days when the city had more than 120 illegal marijuana dispensaries at commercial sites that served more as lounges and bars to the robust regulatory system that currently monitors 16 collectives.
Chief Garcia supports home deliveries. He said more than 30 illegal services are operating in the city.
By the end of the fiscal year, the program will transition from the City Manager's Office to the Police Department's Division of Medical Marijuana Control, Garcia said.
Customer Pamela Gorospe uses medical marijuana to treat her migraines. She said, she's more comfortable driving to a dispensary for her safety.
"The delivery service I used before it was kind of sketchy and I didn't know they were and if they were working for a real dispensary," said Gorospe.
At today's meeting, the council voted 8 to 3 to direct city staff to look at whether medical marijuana distributors, manufacturers and testing labs should be allowed in the city and present their recommendations to the Public Safety, Finance and Strategic Support Committee.
City Councilman Ash Kalra called on the council to have city staff immediately explore the issue, which is also being examined by the state, rather than at the council's next priority setting session in January.
"If the council doesn't find it to be a priority we're going to be falling behind in terms of having a regulatory program that's consistent with what the state is doing," Kalra said.
City Councilman Raul Peralez said having city staff look at the issue now will remove the redundancy of going back to priority setting.
Mayor Sam Liccardo, who was one of the three dissenting votes, said the council will have a difficult time getting work done by placing marijuana above other issues such as public safety and emergency needs for the homeless.